ABSTRACT
Introduction. Primary mediastinal lymphoma (PML) is an aggressive lymphoid tumor treatment success of which is determined by induction therapy. To date, none of the standard chemotherapy regimens (CT) have demonstrated an advantage in efficacy. Intensive therapy programs are associated with high toxicity. Aim - to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two pilot prospective treatment protocols PML-16 and PML-19 as well as the possibility of using the analysis of freely circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to assess MRD in patients with PML. Materials and methods. From January 2016 to January 2022, 34 previously untreated PML patients were included in the study;average age - 32;stage > I - in 60 %;extramediastinal lesions - in 14.7 %;bulky disease - in 73.5 % of patients. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed;ctDNA was determined to assess the completeness of remission. Results. Eighteen patients received treatment according to the PML-16 protocol (6 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of RmNHL-BFM-90 + 4 courses of R-EPOCH). After the end of therapy, all 18 patients achieved PET-negative remission. The next 16 patients received treatment according to the PML-19 protocol (4 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of R-mNHL-BFM-90 + 2 courses of R-EPOCH) in combination with lenalidomide. After the end of therapy, 9 (56 %) patients achieved PET-negative remission;7 (44 %) retained pathological activity (D4-5 points). After 3 and 6 months 15 (94 %) patients achieved normalization of metabolic activity. Considering the high frequency of false-positive results in patients with PML, a ctDNA study was performed to determine the depth of remission in 15 patients. After the end of therapy, all 15 patients had complete elimination of ctDNA. Of these, 5 (33 %) remained PET-positive at the end of treatment. During further observation, after 3-6 months, in 4 patients the level of metabolic activity decreased to physiological without the use of consolidating therapy. After the end of therapy, one patient suffered the new coronavirus infection, COVID-19. A month later, residual formation of SUVmax 14.2 remained in the mediastinum. The patient is currently under observation. With a median follow-up of 36 months (9 to 76 months) all 34 patients are in remission. Conclusion. The effectiveness of PML-16 made it possible to abandon the consolidation therapy and refuted the idea of the need for 6 courses of CT. The combination of programs based on the application of the principle of high-dose short-pulse induction of remission (R-mNHL-BFM-90) in combination with the prolonged administration of medium doses (R-EPOCH) was crucial in achieving a successful result. The inclusion of lenalidomide in the "PML-19" program made it possible to achieve complete remission in 100 % of cases after 4 courses. The possibility of using DNA analysis to assess MRD in patients with PML was shown.Copyright © 2022 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. Primary mediastinal lymphoma (PML) is an aggressive lymphoid tumor treatment success of which is determined by induction therapy. To date, none of the standard chemotherapy regimens (CT) have demonstrated an advantage in efficacy. Intensive therapy programs are associated with high toxicity. Aim - to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two pilot prospective treatment protocols PML-16 and PML-19 as well as the possibility of using the analysis of freely circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to assess MRD in patients with PML. Materials and methods. From January 2016 to January 2022, 34 previously untreated PML patients were included in the study;average age - 32;stage > I - in 60 %;extramediastinal lesions - in 14.7 %;bulky disease - in 73.5 % of patients. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed;ctDNA was determined to assess the completeness of remission. Results. Eighteen patients received treatment according to the PML-16 protocol (6 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of RmNHL-BFM-90 + 4 courses of R-EPOCH). After the end of therapy, all 18 patients achieved PET-negative remission. The next 16 patients received treatment according to the PML-19 protocol (4 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of R-mNHL-BFM-90 + 2 courses of R-EPOCH) in combination with lenalidomide. After the end of therapy, 9 (56 %) patients achieved PET-negative remission;7 (44 %) retained pathological activity (D4-5 points). After 3 and 6 months 15 (94 %) patients achieved normalization of metabolic activity. Considering the high frequency of false-positive results in patients with PML, a ctDNA study was performed to determine the depth of remission in 15 patients. After the end of therapy, all 15 patients had complete elimination of ctDNA. Of these, 5 (33 %) remained PET-positive at the end of treatment. During further observation, after 3-6 months, in 4 patients the level of metabolic activity decreased to physiological without the use of consolidating therapy. After the end of therapy, one patient suffered the new coronavirus infection, COVID-19. A month later, residual formation of SUVmax 14.2 remained in the mediastinum. The patient is currently under observation. With a median follow-up of 36 months (9 to 76 months) all 34 patients are in remission. Conclusion. The effectiveness of PML-16 made it possible to abandon the consolidation therapy and refuted the idea of the need for 6 courses of CT. The combination of programs based on the application of the principle of high-dose short-pulse induction of remission (R-mNHL-BFM-90) in combination with the prolonged administration of medium doses (R-EPOCH) was crucial in achieving a successful result. The inclusion of lenalidomide in the "PML-19" program made it possible to achieve complete remission in 100 % of cases after 4 courses. The possibility of using DNA analysis to assess MRD in patients with PML was shown.Copyright © 2022 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Effective glycaemic control remains the most important task in managing the risks of Diabetes type 2 complications development. In this regard, the choice of insulin preparations with minimal variability of action is of utmost importance since this approach allows achieving the maximum treatment effectiveness and adequate safety level. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate insulin degludec treatment effect on glycemic control in adult patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) type 2 in a real-world clinical setting in the Russian Federation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The open prospective study was conducted in 2020-2021 in 35 clinical centers in 31 cities of the Russian Federation. The study included adult patients with type 2 DM treated according to Russian routine clinical practice. The prospective follow-up period was 26 weeks. The main study endpoints were changes in HbA 1c level, fasting plasma glucose, insulin daily doses, number, and characteristics of different types of hypoglycaemia episodes and adverse events (AEs), and patient preferences compared to previous treatment. RESULTS: The study enrolled 494 patients. By the end of follow-up period: similar to The mean HbA 1c decrease was 1.6% (p<0.0001). similar to Fasting plasma glucose level decreased by 3.4 mmol/L (p<0.0001). similar to Daily basal and prandial insulin doses decreased by 1.6 IU/day (p<0.0001) and 2.1 IU/day (p<0.01), respectively. similar to Severe episodes of hypoglycemia did not occur, while the incidence of nonsevere episodes decreased significantly. similar to 76 patients (15.4%) had 105 AEs, of which 41 (in 33 patients, 6.7%) were serious. similar to COVID-19 was the most frequent AE reported in 21 patients (4.3%). similar to Only in one case insulin degludec was withdrawn due to the patient's pregnancy and the AEs that arose from it. y Most patients (98.6%) preferred insulin degludec to previous treatment. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in glycemic control, accompanied by basal insulin dose decrease combined with the absence of severe episodes of hypoglycemia, and significant decrease of nonsevere episodes (total and nocturnal). These results led to a large proportion of patients wanting to continue insulin degludec treatment preferring the medicine over previous treatment.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Effective glycaemic control remains the most important task in managing the risks of Diabetes type 2 complications development. In this regard, the choice of insulin preparations with minimal variability of action is of utmost importance since this approach allows achieving the maximum treatment effectiveness and adequate safety level. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate insulin degludec treatment effect on glycemic control in adult patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) type 2 in a real-world clinical setting in the Russian Federation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The open prospective study was conducted in 2020-2021 in 35 clinical centers in 31 cities of the Russian Federation. The study included adult patients with type 2 DM treated according to Russian routine clinical practice. The prospective follow-up period was 26 weeks. The main study endpoints were changes in HbA1c level, fasting plasma glucose, insulin daily doses, number, and characteristics of different types of hypoglycaemia episodes and adverse events (AEs), and patient preferences compared to previous treatment. RESULT(S): The study enrolled 494 patients. By the end of follow-up period: * The mean HbA1c decrease was 1.6% (p<0.0001). * Fasting plasma glucose level decreased by 3.4 mmol/L (p<0.0001). * Daily basal and prandial insulin doses decreased by 1.6 IU/day (p<0.0001) and 2.1 IU/day (p<0.01), respectively. * Severe episodes of hypoglycemia did not occur, while the incidence of nonsevere episodes decreased significantly. * 76 patients (15.4%) had 105 AEs, of which 41 (in 33 patients, 6.7%) were serious. * COVID-19 was the most frequent AE reported in 21 patients (4.3%). * Only in one case insulin degludec was withdrawn due to the patient's pregnancy and the AEs that arose from it. * Most patients (98.6%) preferred insulin degludec to previous treatment. CONCLUSION(S): The study demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in glycemic control, accompanied by basal insulin dose decrease combined with the absence of severe episodes of hypoglycemia, and significant decrease of nonsevere episodes (total and nocturnal). These results led to a large proportion of patients wanting to continue insulin degludec treatment preferring the medicine over previous treatment.Copyright © 2023 Russian Association of Endocrinologists. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is enough evidence of the negative impact of excess weight on the formation and progression of res piratory pathology. Given the continuing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, it is relevant to determine the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the clinical features of the novel coronavirus infection (NCI). AIM: To study the effect of BMI on the course of the acute SARS-COV-2 infection and the post-covid period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: AKTIV and AKTIV 2 are multicenter non-interventional real-world registers. The ÐÐТÐÐ registry (n=6396) includes non-overlapping outpatient and inpatient arms with 6 visits in each. The ÐÐТÐÐ 2 registry (n=2968) collected the data of hospitalized patients and included 3 visits. All subjects were divided into 3 groups: not overweight (n=2139), overweight (n=2931) and obese (n=2666). RESULTS: A higher BMI was significantly associated with a more severe course of the infection in the form of acute kidney injury (p=0.018), cytokine storm (p<0.001), serum C-reactive protein over 100 mg/l (p<0.001), and the need for targeted therapy (p<0.001) in the hospitalized patients. Obesity increased the odds of myocarditis by 1,84 times (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1,13-3,00) and the need for anticytokine therapy by 1,7 times (95% CI: 1,30-2,30).The patients with the 1st and 2nd degree obesity, undergoing the inpatient treatment, tended to have a higher probability of a mortality rate. While in case of morbid obesity patients this tendency is the most significant (odds ratio - 1,78; 95% CI: 1,13-2,70). At the same time, the patients whose chronical diseases first appeared after the convalescence period, and those who had certain complaints missing before SARS-CoV-2 infection, more often had BMI of more than 30 kg/m2 (p<0,001).Additionally, the odds of death increased by 2,23 times (95% CI: 1,05-4,72) within 3 months after recovery in obese people over the age of 60 yearsCONCLUSION. Overweight and/or obesity is a significant risk factor for severe course of the new coronavirus infection and the associated cardiovascular and kidney damage Overweight people and patients with the 1st and 2nd degree obesity tend to have a high risk of death of SARS-CoV-2 infection in both acute and post-covid periods. On top of that, in case of morbid obesity patients this tendency is statistically significant. Normalization of body weight is a strategic objective of modern medicine and can contribute to prevention of respiratory conditions, severe course and complications of the new coronavirus infection.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Body Mass Index , Patient Discharge , Overweight , Hospitals , ObesityABSTRACT
Introduction. Primary mediastinal lymphoma (PML) is an aggressive lymphoid tumor treatment success of which is determined by induction therapy. To date, none of the standard chemotherapy regimens (CT) have demonstrated an advantage in efficacy. Intensive therapy programs are associated with high toxicity. Aim - to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two pilot prospective treatment protocols PML-16 and PML-19 as well as the possibility of using the analysis of freely circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to assess MRD in patients with PML. Materials and methods. From January 2016 to January 2022, 34 previously untreated PML patients were included in the study;average age - 32;stage > I - in 60 %;extramediastinal lesions - in 14.7 %;bulky disease - in 73.5 % of patients. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET- CT) was performed;ctDNA was determined to assess the completeness of remission. Results. Eighteen patients received treatment according to the PML-16 protocol (6 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of R-mNHL-BFM-90 + 4 courses of R-EPOCH). After the end of therapy, all 18 patients achieved PET-negative remission. The next 16 patients received treatment according to the PML-19 protocol (4 courses of chemotherapy;2 blocks of R-mNHL-BFM-90 + 2 courses of R-EPOCH) in combination with lenalidomide. After the end of therapy, 9 (56 %) patients achieved PET-negative remission;7 (44 %) retained pathological activity (D4-5 points). After 3 and 6 months 15 (94 %) patients achieved normalization of metabolic activity. Considering the high frequency of false-positive results in patients with PML, a ctDNA study was performed to determine the depth of remission in 15 patients. After the end of therapy, all 15 patients had complete elimination of ctDNA. Of these, 5 (33 %) remained PET-positive at the end of treatment. During further observation, after 3-6 months, in 4 patients the level of metabolic activity decreased to physiological without the use of consolidating therapy. After the end of therapy, one patient suffered the new coronavirus infection, COVID-19. A month later, residual formation of SUVmax 14.2 remained in the mediastinum. The patient is currently under observation. With a median follow-up of 36 months (9 to 76 months) all 34 patients are in remission. Conclusion. The effectiveness of PML-16 made it possible to abandon the consolidation therapy and refuted the idea of the need for 6 courses of CT. The combination of programs based on the application of the principle of high-dose short-pulse induction of remission (R-mNHL-BFM-90) in combination with the prolonged administration of medium doses (R-EPOCH) was crucial in achieving a successful result. The inclusion of lenalidomide in the "PML-19" program made it possible to achieve complete remission in 100 % of cases after 4 courses. The possibility of using DNA analysis to assess MRD in patients with PML was shown.
ABSTRACT
Under auspices of the Eurasian Association of Therapists (EUAT), a Council of Experts (COE) was organized to develop criteria for the timing of administration (day of illness onset) of COVID-globulin, dosing regimens and patient phenotypes depending on comorbid pathology to optimize indications and achieve maximum effectiveness of virus-neutralizing therapy. The need for COE creation is related to the lack of criteria based on large-scale evidence-based studies. That is why the working group of COE includes experts in all fields of internal medicine, in particular, transfusiology specialists. The COE activity was held with the participation of largest plasma transfusion centers for recuperative patients including Clinical Hospitals No. 40 and 52 of the Moscow City Government Department of Health, and the N. V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Emergency Medicine. Copyright © 2022 Authors. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
By the middle of 2021, the official global number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients was close to 230 million, but the number accounting for asymptomatic patients was much higher. Consequences and rehabilitation after COVID-19 are of particular interest and raise many controversial and unresolved issues. On May 18, 2021, the Eurasian Association of Therapists organized an international panel of experts to analyze challenges associated with the post-COVID-19 period. This panel aimed to develop approaches to identify gaps in the discussed issues. This interdisciplinary team of leading experts reviewed the current literature and presented their data to formulate practical guidance on management of patients after COVID-19. The panel of experts also presented recommendations on how to implement the gained knowledge into health care practices. Copyright © 2021, Silicea-Poligraf. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
A dangerous viral disease COVID-19, caused by a new RNA coronavirus SARS-COV-2, has been actively spreading in the world since December 2019. The main manifestations of this disease are bilateral pneumonia, often accompanied by the development of acute respiratory syndrome and respiratory failure. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk of infection with the SARS-COV-2 virus, severe illness and death. Maintaining of target glycemic levels is the most important factor in a favorable outcome of COVID-19 in both type 1 and type 2 DM. The choice of antihyperglycemic therapy in a patient with DM in the acute period of COVID-19 depends on the initial therapy, the severity of hyperglycemia, the severity of the viral infection and the patient's clinical condition. The article presents the recommendations of the board of experts of the Russian Association of Endocrinologists on glycemic control and the choice of antihyperglycemic therapy in patients with type 2 DM and COVID-19, and also on the use of glucocorticosteroids used in the treatment of COVID-19 in patients with type 2 DM. Copyright © Endocrinology Research Centre, 2022.
ABSTRACT
A dangerous viral disease COVID-19, caused by a new RNA coronavirus SARS-COV-2, has been actively spreading in the world since December 2019. The main manifestations of this disease are bilateral pneumonia, often accompanied by the development of acute respiratory syndrome and respiratory failure. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk of infection with the SARS-COV-2 virus, severe illness and death. Maintaining of target glycemic levels is the most important factor in a favorable outcome of COVID-19 in both type 1 and type 2 DM. The choice of antihyperglycemic therapy in a patient with DM in the acute period of COVID-19 depends on the initial therapy, the severity of hyperglycemia, the severity of the viral infection and the patient's clinical condition. The article presents the recommendations of the board of experts of the Russian Association of Endocrinologists on glycemic control and the choice of antihyperglycemic therapy in patients with type 2 DM and COVID-19, and also on the use of glucocorticosteroids used in the treatment of COVID-19 in patients with type 2 DM.
ABSTRACT
Coding of the causes of death of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) in the Russian Federation is one of the long-discussed problems, due to the comorbidity of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and a number of contradictions in the key regulatory documents regulating the statistics of mortality in this category of patients, which acquires particular relevance in the context of the coronavirus pandemic, due to its negative impact on the outcomes of the course of COVID-19 and mortality risks. In pursuance of the decisions of the Minutes of the meeting of the working group under the project committee of the National Project «Health» on identifying patterns in the formation of mortality rates of the population dated January 20, 2021 No. 1, chaired by Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation T.A. Golikova, experts of two directions - endocrinology and pathological anatomy, prepared a Draft of agreed recommendations on the Rules for coding the causes of death of patients with diabetes, causing the greatest problems in terms of the use of ICD-10 when choosing the initial cause of death, including in the case of death from CVD and COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients (pts) with acute leukemia (AL) are at high risk of COVID-19 severe and lethal course. Intensive chemotherapy and immunosuppression in these patients are the possible causes of high mortality. Emerging data on risk factors and outcomes in this vulnerable patient population is aimed to support strategies of their medical care. Aims: To evaluate treatment outcomes and risk factors in pts with AL and COVID-19 in a real-world setting. Methods: CHRONOS19 [NCT04422470] is an ongoing nationwide observational cohort study of adult (≥18 y) pts with hematologic disease (both malignant and non-malignant) and lab-confirmed or suspected (based on clinical and/or CT findings) COVID-19. We performed a subgroup analysis of pts with AL and COVID-19. Primary objective was to evaluate treatment outcomes and identify risk factors associated with higher mortality in this group of pts. Primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. Long-term follow-up was performed at 90 and 180 days. Data from 14 centers was collected on a web-based platform and managed in a deidentified manner. Results: As of data cutoff on January 27, 2021, 575 pts were included in the registry, 132 of them with AL were eligible for primary endpoint assessment n(%): AML - 86(65%), ALL - 37(28%), APL - 9(7%);M/F 55(42%)/77(58%), median age 45 [18-79] years, induction phase/R/R/ treatment in remission 49(37%)/27(21%)/ 54(42%), agranulocytosis in 55(42%) pts, 68(53%) pts were transfusion dependent, comorbidities - in 58(45%) pts. Complications developed in 98(74%) pts: pneumonia (71%), sepsis (9%), CRS (8%), ARDS (6%). One-third of pts had severe COVID-19, 30% were admitted to ICU, 26% required mechanical ventilation. We performed comparative analysis of characteristics between a group of pts with AL and other hematologic diseases (lymphomas, chronic leukemia, multiple myeloma, and other malignant and non-malignant diseases): pts with AL had significantly more frequent agranulocytosis (42% vs 20%, p<0,001), transfusion dependence (53% vs 33%, p<0,001), and a higher rate of admission to ICU (30% vs 20%, p=0,036). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 24% in pts with AL vs. 15% in pts with other hematologic diseases (p=0,03);70% of deaths were due to COVID- 19 complications in pts with AL. At 90 days, one additional death due to COVID-19 occurred. At 180 days, 5 more deaths due to leukemia progression were registered. Risk factors that were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) are listed in Table 1. In multivariate analysis, ICU + mechanical ventilation, HR, 70.258 (19.5-270.0) and age >60 years HR, 3.340 (1.08-10.9) were the most significant risk factors of death. Overall, AL were associated with a higher risk of death, HR, 2.40 (1.28-4.51), compared to less aggressive diseases (CML, CLL, MM, lymphomas, non-malignant), HR, 0.54 (0.37-0.80). COVID-19 affected treatment of AL in 65% of pts, 58% experienced treatment delay for a median of 4 [1-10] weeks. In 11 of 103 (10,7%) pts with AL early relapse/refractory disease was detected, but the association of relapses with affected treatment is unknown. COVID-19 re-infection was described in 2 patients. Summary/Conclusion: Thirty-day all-cause mortality was significantly higher in SARS-CoV-2-infected pts with AL than in those with other hematologic diseases. Longer-term follow-up (180 days) for AL outcomes and OS will be presented.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. The SARS-CoV-2 infection (COronaVlrus Disease 2019, COVID-19) usually progresses uncomplicated in an acute respiratory form but causes frequent severe illness in oncohaematological patients. Aim analysis of the management and efficacy of medical aid at a haematology clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients. The clinic admitted 2,130 patients in April 20 November 20, 2020, with 920 of them triaged into observatory wards. At the time of admission, 907 (98.5 %) patients were SARS-CoV-2 RNA-negative, with 13 hospitalised without nasopharyngeal swab tests. Patient nosology: 235 (25.5 %) lymphoma, 152 (16.5 %) multiple myeloma, 131 (14.2 %) acute leucaemia, 86 (9.3 %) haemophilia, 35 (4 %) Gaucher's disease, 17 (1.8 %) Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, 16 (1.7 %) aplastic anaemia, 153 (16.6 %) various surgical diseases, 81 (8.8 %) other haematological diseases and 14 (1.6 %) were bone marrow donors. Results. Among the 920 patients admitted to the observatory, 139 (15 %) were severe and 653 (71 %) had a moderate condition. Fever was reported in 124 (13.5 %) patients at admission. Chest computed tomography (CT) was performed in 809 patients, with recent lung inflammation detected in 121 (15 %) cases. Twenty four (2.6 %) patients were revealed SARS-CoV-2-positive, with 20 diagnoses PCR-verified and four in chest CT. Ten patients were diagnosed positive in routine examination or at a specialty unit as fever aggravated. Thus, a two -staged SARS-CoV-2 screening with PCR and chest CT allowed an extra 2.6 % detection of COVID-19 cases despite negative tests at admission. Conclusion. The observatory management has reduced the likelihood of nosocomial COVID-19 and ensured a continued supply of specialty medical aid.
ABSTRACT
Background: By 11/03/2020, the WHO had declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. At 25/05/2020 Russia ranked third by the incidence of COVID-19 and the number of confirmed cases was 344,481 with 3,541(1%) deaths. Aim: To describe the epidemiological characteristics and survival of patients with hematological diseases (HD) and COVID-19. Patients: Between 20/04/2020-25/05/2020, all hospitalized patients at NRCH were tested for COVID-19 before hospitalization and with once-weekly follow-up (or in case of fever). Nasal swab samples were studied by RT-PCR. The study population included 46 patients (pts) with HD and confirmed SARS-CoV-2. All pts were observed at ten departments. 15 pts who shared the same wards (3-4 patients in one ward) at one department were infected. Ten infected pts resided in single-bed wards and 21 pts were observed at the outpatient department. All pts with positive SARS-CoV-2 were treated either in COVID-19-specialized centers (29 (63%) pts) or at home (17 (37%) pts). Results: The most common symptom at the onset of illness was fever (26 (57%) pts), the other pts were asymptomatic. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 27 pts. All 17 pts who were treated at home recovered. Out of 8 pts who required treatment at the ICU, 5 pts died. Thirty-eight pts were treated without ICU (1 pt died due to sudden death). As of 25/05/2020, 10 out of 29 pts were still hospitalized. Totally, 13 pts were discharged, and 6 pts died. Out of the 8 pts who were admitted to the ICU, 1 pt was still at the ICU, 1 pt was discharged and returned home, 1 pt was transferred to the general wards, and 5 pts died. Six (13%) of 46 pts required IMV;of them, 5 pts died and 1 pt still remains. Conclusion: In this single-center analysis of 46 pts with HD and confirmed SARS-CoV-2, 1-month OS was 82%, the median follow-up was 18 days, and mortality was 13%. Compared to the general population with COVID-19 in Russia, the mortality in patients with HD was higher (13% vs 1%) with the comparable median age (40 vs 45 years). The COVID-19 pandemic dictates new epidemiological conditions for the management of pts with HD: mandatory SARS-CoV-19 testing in all pts before hospitalization followed by weekly testing, treatment in single-room wards and compliance with strict epidemiological measures.
ABSTRACT
Hemostatic disorders play an important role in the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of COVID-19. The purpose of the research was a detailed consideration of the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and methods of diagnosing and treatment of coronavirus-induced coagulopathy (CIC). At the onset of COVID-19, hypercoagulability is detected, and consumption coagulopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) syndrome are usually observed at later stages of the disease. In the pathogenesis of hypercoagulation in patients with COVID-19, pro-inflammatory cytokines, hyperfibrinogenemia, increased blood levels of von Willebrand factor, factor VIII, neutrophilic extracellular traps, platelet activation, production of antiphospholipid antibodies, microvesicles are of importance. Laboratory findings show increased plasma concentrations of D-dimer, fibrinogen, a longer prothrombin time and a decrease in the number of platelets. The cumulative incidence of thrombotic complications ranges from 21 to 31%. Thrombosis risk factors are intensive care unit stay, leukocytosis, and a high plasma D-dimer concentration. Differential diagnosing of CIC should be carried out with disseminated intravascular coagulation, sepsis-induced coagulopathy, antiphospholipid, hemophagocytic syndromes, thrombotic microangiopathy, and heparin-induced thromocytopenia. CIC may be complicated by sepsis, antiphospholipid syndrome, hemophagocytic syndrome, thrombotic microangiopathy, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The main therapy is low molecular weight heparins treatment. Treatment recommendations are provided. © 2020 Medical Education. All rights reserved.